

Spring at my house, April 10, 2013
"All the kind people have a dream: Margaret on the guillotine." Morrissey
Letters from The Wichita Eagle, April 10, 2013
Logical policy
Politicians swear on the Bible. The Bible clearly teaches that life begins at conception, as is found in Luke 1 and 2 (God becomes man and dwells among us) among many other passages. It seems logical, therefore, for politicians to affirm that life begins at conception.
JEROME SPEXARTH
Pastor
St. Patrick Catholic Church
Wichita
(JRM Comment: I would expect noting less from a pastor of a Catholic church, or any other Christian Church.
The issue is when does life begin. We don’t have that answer in the bible, not really. Do we know when Jesus was conceived? Hell! We don’t even know when he was born - the month, date or year. The gospel writers don’t even let us know what day he died.
Even if you believe in a sky daddy, how did that entity seduce, rape and impregnate the innocent, teenaged girl? Did he marry her? Answering that question will tell us if Jesus was legitimate or illegitimate. If Mary and Sky Daddy were wed, what was she doing being Betrothed to Joseph, and if she later married Joseph, was she committing adultery and bigamy?
Did Jesus have a belly button? Did he need one? Adam didn’t. Eve didn’t. I guess I’m not in god’s image, because god’s imaged folk didn’t have an umbilicus, and I do.
Government has no business inside anyone’s womb!
*****
Ethical quandary
The Legislature recently passed a bill stating that life begins at fertilization. Thus, a zygote is technically a protected entity.
I find this definition of life biologically and – most important – philosophically suspect. The problem is that those who are certain where life begins are unclear as to where life ends. Put simply: What is to become of the fetus that is not born and does not miscarry, yet refuses to go away?
Take the existence of parasitic twins – clumps of biological refuse with separate DNA. Indeed, these share many of the same characteristics of an undeveloped fetus: separate genetic structure, separate biological system and inextricably dependent on its host. People who rail against abortion will have no qualms about having a mass of alien tissue or clumps of foreign teeth or hair removed.
This points up a larger ethical quandary: Much bandwidth, ink and television hours have been devoted to homilies about the sacred status of the brainless zygote and the mindless embryo. Who will speak up for the autosite, the fetus in fetu or even the vestigial limb?
Until this problem is addressed, I find the “life at conception” position impossible to take seriously.
RYAN JACKSON
Wichita
(JRM Comment: T’aint the only problems. I wish this were a national law. I’d sue for nine months back social security payments. And, I’d invent a device that would determine the precise instant sperm and eggs have a match-up. And another device to determine how many of those match-ups are aborted by the sky fairy, himself.)
*****
Answered prayer?
Are Muslim prayers answered any more often than Christian prayers?
ROGER PEACH
Wichita
(JRM Comment: Prayers can never answered by a non-existent sky daddy, no matter by what name you call him. What we perceive as answered prayer is the same thing we experience when we buy a lottery ticket and win three bucks. It let’s us know that lottery tickets can and do win. This is called intermittent reinforcement; sometimes we win so we keep on trying. Prayer works the same way. Sometimes what we pray for comes to pass. But that is just random chance, not evidence of a sky daddy. But, dumb as most people are, we claim the unanswered prayers are sky daddy deciding against us for his own sovereign reasons. Few stop to consider that prayers aren’t answered because there is no one to answer them.)
Recent Comments